Blink HQ200 vs Enphase CS-100 EVSE
The Enphase CS-100 EVSE outputs 80 A (19.2 kW) versus 50 A (12 kW) for the Blink HQ200 — about 60% faster charging on vehicles that can accept it. Only the Enphase CS-100 EVSE offers Wi-Fi/app connectivity. The Blink HQ200 draws less standby power (0.96 W vs 2.49 W). The Blink HQ200 has the longer charging cable (23 ft vs 18 ft).
| Blink HQ200 | Enphase CS-100 EVSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Connector type | J1772 | J1772 |
| Max output current | 50 A | 80 A |
| Max output power | 12 kW | 19.2 kW |
| Wi-Fi / app connected | No | Yes |
| Cable length | 23 ft | 18 ft |
| ENERGY STAR certified | Yes | Yes |
| Input voltage | 240 V | 240 V |
| Standby power draw | 0.96 W | 2.49 W |
Frequently asked questions
Which is faster, the Blink HQ200 or the Enphase CS-100 EVSE?
The Enphase CS-100 EVSE: 80 A (19.2 kW) against 50 A (12 kW), provided your EV's onboard charger can use the extra power.
Are the Blink HQ200 and Enphase CS-100 EVSE both ENERGY STAR certified?
Yes — every charger in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified EVSE list.