Blink HQ200 vs Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G
The Blink HQ200 outputs 50 A (12 kW) versus 48 A (11.52 kW) for the Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G — about 4% faster charging on vehicles that can accept it. Only the Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G offers Wi-Fi/app connectivity. The Blink HQ200 draws less standby power (0.96 W vs 3.78 W). The Blink HQ200 has the longer charging cable (23 ft vs 18 ft).
| Blink HQ200 | Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G | |
|---|---|---|
| Connector type | J1772 | J1772 |
| Max output current | 50 A | 48 A |
| Max output power | 12 kW | 11.52 kW |
| Wi-Fi / app connected | No | Yes |
| Cable length | 23 ft | 18 ft |
| ENERGY STAR certified | Yes | Yes |
| Input voltage | 240 V | 240 V |
| Standby power draw | 0.96 W | 3.78 W |
Frequently asked questions
Which is faster, the Blink HQ200 or the Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G?
The Blink HQ200: 50 A (12 kW) against 48 A (11.52 kW), provided your EV's onboard charger can use the extra power.
Are the Blink HQ200 and Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G both ENERGY STAR certified?
Yes — every charger in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified EVSE list.